Services & Engagement Models

Software QA & Testing

Our team of quality assurance specialists is expert at conducting high-end testing. Whether performing manual, functional, or load automation testing, we provide cutting-edge testing services for applications that are stand-alone, client/server or web-based, using tools including QTP, Winrunner, openSTA, and Selenium.

How Testing with Neova Saves Money

Rapid development always means the engineering team is writing code fast, but it doesn't mean they're testing it fast. And yet it really must be tested to avoid problems in both the near and farther future.

Our team can take all the code written in a day, and test it while our US-based client is sleeping. It is an example of where a time difference is very helpful, and a method of using a remote team is clearly advantageous, in terms of both cost and efficiency.

No matter the type of testing--be it load testing, or scalability testing, or testing for cross platform, browser, or device compatibility, neglecting testing early on in the development process is an all-too-common problem that easily leads to adverse, expensive consequences later on in the development and product life cycle.

Neova orchestrates automated and interactive regression test environments that ensure our customers' subsequent application releases are of superior quality, and are delivered on schedule. Our end-to-end test process and methodology ensures the highest level of test solutions.

We can either completely take responsibility of all testing activities for your organization or be part of your quality assurance team. Our methodologies, progress updates, and continuous monitoring ensure smooth and transparent remote operations.

Lasting Value of Automation Testing

Lots of teams talk about it but, in reality, few engineering teams implement proper automation testing. Time pressures and delivery requirements often push automation testing to the back-burner, despite how very valuable it is to have in place.

We work in parallel to write and implement automation testing for our clients. The benefits of having us do this kind of work are long-lasting. Once implemented, the automation tests can be used extensively without a lot of additional support.

Some code simply has to be tested manually--subjective UI testing, for example, or features that must be tested prior to release, when automation testing cannot be set up quickly enough. But once the feature is stable and released, developing automation testing for it presents a truly significant cost savings over time. Even when that existing feature is revised in a subsequent releases, the cost to update its respective automation test is lower than the cost was to create that feature's initial automation test, and is lower than continued manual testing, as well.

How Automation Testing Improves Regression Testing

Regression testing is rarely neglected, of course but without automation, it is generally an arduous, manual process that eats up many engineering hours and presents unfortunate opportunities to introduce human error.

There's only so much a human can do! Automation tests greatly increase the speed and efficacy of the regression testing process. When automation testing is introduced, cost-savings is not even the most valuable benefit (in our opinion). The best part of implementing proper automation testing is that the sheer quality of the software product is greatly increased.

Code Coverage Testing

When source code is created, there is a huge number of paths through which a user can move through the code. An oft-neglected aspect of high-quality software development, code coverage is a special kind testing that determines the percentage of possible pathways that are even being tested by whatever testing scripts are in place.

Most engineering departments are not actually aware of what percentage of these possibilities have been tested within their own code. Upon adopting code coverage tests, it is typical to find that only 40% to 50% of existing source code is being tested via manual tests or automation scripts.

The nirvana of code coverage is 100% coverage--to know that one has tested every single way the code could be used or followed. That's nearly impossible. However, through the use of code coverage testing, and manual and automation testing implemented accordingly, companies increase their tested code to between 80% and 90%.

Engineering within a code-covered environment refines product quality to a great degree, and save money by anticipating and reducing bugs and decreasing user complaints.